Skip to main content

The Right Editor

Any written work that is moving from your hands to the hands of another should be edited. Yes, I will excuse the little things like grocery lists given to errand-runners and phone messages taken for your mother, but I strongly believe that there is very little that should not first pass before the eyes of an editor before it reaches its final destination. We can all agree that "Worcestershire" may be spelled incorrectly when we're pushing a cart down the condiment section of the grocery store, just as we can agree that it must be spelled correctly if we're writing a letter of complaint to the CEO of Lea and Perrins. But what about its spelling in a public social media post or in a general newsletter to friends and colleagues? Wouldn't you agree that these are also instances where spelling should be of utmost importance?

Any decent editor can take care of spelling errors, but "any decent editor" may not necessarily be the right editor for you. Below I highlight 3 of the most common problems of amateur writers (which are in addition to seeing editing as a superfluous expense) and briefly explain why they continue to remain problems for them. Perhaps one or more of these are applicable to you and if so, I hope this little entry today is of some help to you. It is why I do this for a living.

1. Preserving Tone, Voice, and Intent

I'd be lying if I said that I have never tried to change the very fine work of another just because it didn't sound like my own voice when I read it. Not only was this a prime example of valuable time well wasted, it was arrogance borne out of ignorance. Neither tone, nor voice, nor intent need be altered any way unless the quality and effectiveness of the piece is compromised. The right editor knows how important it is to preserve each of these, delightfully proving by extension that not all editors are thin-lipped marms or sweaty cubicle-dwellers, wielding red pens like swords to deliberately desecrate your art.

2. Collaborating

Most editors want to see a finished piece before they will agree to work with you. Developmental editors will edit your piece as you're writing it, and perhaps even help you to get started. The right editor will encourage you to schedule meetings with them so that you may discuss the content of your work in a step-by-step process, regardless of the length. You have to believe that even that little piece needs editing, and you have to feel both comfortable and confident with the person you have chosen to do so. In fact, you should be made to feel that you are the only client and that the success of their business depends on your exclusive satisfaction.

3. Insecurity

Not all writers respond to bad reviews as poorly as Anne Rice or Nicholas Sparkes (I encourage you to read about them online), but reviews are an excellent way of revealing the relationship between writer and editor to be one of artist and critic. Indeed, for the desired result to be produced the combination must go together like peanut butter and jelly. But jalepeño/red pepper jelly does not go with peanut butter...and does not make for a very marketable menu item. Likewise, the right editor will critique, not criticize. Writers are sensitive enough about their work without having a fiery editor highlighting all the negative points, making them feel bad not only about the piece in question but about their writing in general. And the smaller the piece, the greater the potential for insecurity. This is a claim I make based exclusively on my experience with short story and how-to guide writers whose self-publishing path has allowed them to move from the inspiration to the publication phase without so much as a second set of eyes to proofread. 

With this said, I am not claiming to be the "right" editor for everyone. My most sincere efforts will not necessarily result in clients feeling completely comfortable with me, nor will my best efforts to preserve tone, voice, and intent prove satisfactory to all types of storytellers. Heck, my well-intentioned efforts to make the new writer feel comfortable may prove disconcerting.

But I'd love to try.  







Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any questions or comments about the contents of this blog or the services of Your Words' Worth, please do not hesitate to leave them here. Your words mean a lot!

Popular posts from this blog

What Type of Editing Service Do I Need?

All writers need the services of an editor. No matter how good they are, or believe themselves to be, they are guaranteed to make mistakes. This is much more likely to happen when the creative juices are really flowing and their hands can’t keep up with their brains. Yes, autocorrect can come to the rescue of quick typists who frequently misspell common words while Grammarly catches the sentence fragments and incongruous tenses, but neither of these can take the place of a trained editor.  Yes, you need the services of an editor. And while you may know this already, it is safe to question whether or not you know what type of editing service you need. Thankfully, writing editors can offer up to 4 levels of editing service, each of which cater to a very specific type of writing level, or stage of the draft. It is important to know that while most writers of books may require all 4 levels of service, smaller-scale writing may not necessarily require more than 2 or 3 of these services....
1 comment
Read more

Can I Publish The Traditional Way?

Before I answer this question I’ll present a few statistics for your consideration. Currently in the US,  there are approx. 50,000 published authors working full-time, with only 20% of these earning enough from their books to pay their bills. In Canada, the percentage is much more frightening with published authors, on average, making less than $10,000 per year - and this is down from $17,000 just two decades ago. I have no data for Canadian writers sustaining themselves with their writing income exclusively, but I have to believe the number is extremely low. Assuming you’re okay with this, I’ll move on. Traditional publishing is, arguably, the preferred route. After all, you get paid for your work and your company takes care of all the marketing. But if you are a new writer you will have to put in extra work because you don’t know the world of publishing and you’ve yet to establish a reputation for yourself in it. Some of this work includes choosing a marketable genre, having...
Post a Comment
Read more

Initialisms? IMHO, Don't Use Them

What is the difference between an acronym and an initialism? An acronym is an abbreviation of a word where the initial letters of each word used in the abbreviation are pronounced as a word. Examples of this include AIDS and AWOL. An initialism is exactly the same, except the letters are pronounced separately. Examples of this include HIV and NCIS. If we want to get detailed we can also add mnemonic to this list, but for the sake of brevity I leave that to you to read about in your own time. If you're in business, I recommend that you do. I'll level with you and admit freely that I enjoy the occasional initialism. In both text and Facebook messages I am much more inclined to type TTYL, LMAO, and IMHO than I am to write their meanings out in full. As an editor I know better, but it’s very hard to ignore the delicious autocorrect invitation to skip the typing, and even harder to argue against the fact that almost everyone knows what these letters stand for. The truth is, these...
Post a Comment
Read more